Tax Innovation
TaxPad: The Birth of Question Engineering
Note: The TaxPad case study reflects an analytical response produced independently by Bright Chinule during a Deloitte innovation assessment. It uses publicly available data and does not represent Deloitte’s internal strategies, systems, or intellectual property. The Question Engineering™ methodology demonstrated here is an original framework solely authored and owned by Bright Chinule.
Application of Question Engineering
This project became the first live instance of what would later be formalized as the Question Engineering (QE) Framework.
The Challenge
QE Approach
The Discovery
Process Details
1. Interrogate
Rather than accept the premise, the QE process challenged the assumptions: Was digital filing truly unavailable? Was automation the right intervention, or was the bottleneck elsewhere? What evidence exists that ‘inability to file’ is caused by lack of technology? Data showed HMRC had already invested £650 million in a digital portal used by over 10 million taxpayers. Therefore, the issue was not infrastructure, but interpretation.
2. Deconstruct
The brief was broken down into its atomic components: Actors (Expats, HMRC, Deloitte specialists), Actions (Filing, automation, awareness), Pain points (Uncertainty, confusion, policy navigation). Digital ethnography (expat forums and Q&A platforms) revealed three distinct user groups: Those unaware they needed to file, those aware but unsure how, and those unable to find credible help.
3. Reconstruct
Synthesizing this data revealed the real issue: not lack of automation, but information ambiguity and navigational complexity. Users were overwhelmed by unclear rules and technical language. The refined problem statement became: ‘How might we make the process of filing tax returns easier for expats to understand and navigate digitally?’
4. Design
This question led to the creation of TaxPad — a conceptual prototype for a guided, community-based interface simplifying tax filing through contextual education rather than automation. TaxPad positioned itself as a clarity tool, not a processing tool.
Significance to QE
This case became the prototype for Question Engineering itself. It validated three founding insights: Most briefs begin with answers masquerading as questions. Innovation only succeeds when we interrogate the assumption before designing the solution. The true value of inquiry is not direction — it is clarity. From this case, QE was born — not as an academic concept, but as a forensic, evidence-based method for engineering the right question and powering innovation.
Impact
The original question ‘How might we automate tax filing?’ was replaced by ‘How might we clarify tax filing so people can do it confidently?’ This single reframing redirected the entire innovation trajectory, demonstrating that when assumptions are interrogated before investment, solutions become leaner, truer, and more valuable.